3. Differences between Japanese Accounting
Principles and International Accounting Standards
|
As stated in Note 1, there are differences between the accounting
principles and practices and disclosure requirements in Japan ("Japanese
GAAP") and under International Accounting Standards ("IAS"). With respect
only to the consolidated financial statements for 2000, the Company has
identified differences between Japanese GAAP and IAS including the
significant items summarized below.
It has generally not been practicable to quantify the
effects on net income of these differences in accounting policy and
determine the additional disclosure required by IAS.
(1) Accounting Principles of Overseas Consolidated
Subsidiaries
The Company consolidates the accounts of foreign subsidiaries based on
their accounting records maintained in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles and practices prevailing in the respective countries
of domicile. Under IAS 27, the accounting principles used in the financial
statements of consolidated subsidiaries should be conformed to the
accounting principles of the Group before such financial statements are
consolidated.
(2) Leases
IAS 17 requires that finance leases be reflected in the lessee's
accounts by recording an asset and liability equal to the lower of the net
fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum
lease payments. The asset should be depreciated and rentals apportioned
between finance charges and reduction of the outstanding liability. As
described in Note 2 (13), in Japan, finance leases may be accounted for in
the same manner as operating leases. For the years ended March 31, 2000
and 1999, the Company had no finance leases that were required to be
capitalized.
(3) Translation of Foreign Currencies
As described in Note 2 (12), assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are translated at historical exchange rates. This is
not in accordance with IAS 21 which requires foreign currency monetary
items to be translated at the rate of exchange in effect at each balance
sheet date.
Financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated
into Japanese yen in the manner described in Note 2 (12). This translation
policy is not in accordance with IAS 21 which requires income and expenses
be translated at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
(4) Inventories
As noted in Note 2 (4), the Company and consolidated domestic
subsidiaries value inventories at cost. IAS 2 requires that inventories be
measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Furthermore, for
determining the cost of certain inventories the Company applies the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method which is an allowed alternative treatment
under IAS 2 for which additional disclosure is required.
(5) Employees' Retirement Benefits
The Company and its domestic consolidated subsidiaries provide for the
liability in respect of lump-sum retirement benefits as described in Note
2 (10).
Under IAS 19, pension costs are recognized and computed
using a particular actuarial approach known as the accrued benefit
valuation method or, alternatively, the projected benefit valuation
method.
(6) Financial Instruments
Market value information relating to marketable securities and
information relating to the nature, amounts, and unrealized gains and
losses on outstanding derivative transactions are required to be disclosed
in Japan. IAS 25 and 32 require disclosure for each class of financial
asset, financial liability, and equity instrument, information relating to
the extent and nature, accounting policies and methods adopted, exposure
to interest rate and credit risk, and fair values.
Since the required disclosure information is not available,
the financial statement disclosure is not in accordance with IAS 25 and
32. |